I think there are at least a few important questions to consider when this type of thinking creeps into our heads.
Why should an arbitrary index price
really matter anyway?
Did anyone wake up the day after
the S&P 500 broke 1,500 and say “Well, I am not going into work today”? If any of you are business owners did you
decide to furlough employees after seeing the Dow closed over 14,000?
The answer is clearly no. Does the psychologically significant index level
affect the current natural gas boom in the United States or change the mind
blowing advances and future potential of 3D printing? Of course not. Everyone is susceptible to the emotional
stress of new market highs, but when you actually take a minute to reflect on
why they should matter it seems kind of silly.
We have lost sight
of the fact that the markets represent partial ownership in real, tangible
companies across the globe.
Businesses are not going to change how they operate based on the number
of an index.
But what about valuation?
With a little thought exercise it is easy to see that
index price alone should have absolutely zero bearing on investment returns,
but the market could still be overvalued, right? Sure it is possible. Anything is possible. But the US and World Economy are actually on
much better ground than in 2007 and 2008. The 2012 estimated earnings for the S&P
500 is around $102/share. That is an
all-time high and well above the $82/share that existed the last time the
market indexes reached these levels. In
fact, the forward P/E estimate for the S&P 500 is just under 15x. The last time the indexes reached these
levels the P/E ratio was around 21x. In other words, the market was
priced 40% higher at the end of 2007 than it is today.
The P/E ratio is not always the
greatest measure of value either. At
some point in 2009 the current P/E ratio of the S&P 500 was over 100x! This was due to the horrible earnings being
reported at the time. But in hindsight we
know this was the market bottom and would have been the perfect time to
purchase equities.
The current P/E ratio of around 15x
is actually right in line with the historical average. The Earnings Yield, which is the inverse of
the P/E ratio, is right at 7%. This can
be interpreted as the earnings the S&P 500 provide for each share of the
market you own. Similar to a Dividend
Yield which is the amount of dividends provided by each share of the market you
own. The current Earnings Yield aligns
perfectly with the long run real rate of return of the stock market (10% - 3%
inflation = 7%). So holding everything else constant when the market is
trading at historically average valuation levels we would expect to get the
historical average real rate of return going forward.
The evidence suggests the fascination with the numbers 1,500
and 14,000 are largely overblown. It is
certainly possible to see a market correction but in the context of your long
term investment plan market corrections are nothing more than a buying
opportunity. Attempting to time the “peak”
of the market has unquestionably been proven hazardous to your health and your nest
egg. Just ask anyone who had money with
any of the numerous advisors, hedge funds, or mutual funds last year who held
excess cash to avoid the presidential election, European troubles, or the “fiscal
cliff”…
No comments:
Post a Comment